Skip to main content
Notifications
You're all caught up.
View all notifications
Backsplice
  • Product
  • Watney AI
  • Why us
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Security
  • About
  • Log in
  • Start free
Log in Start free

Blog

Practical guidance on AI governance and HIPAA compliance, written for the people who run the program.

Subscribe by RSS to hear when a new post is published

Information Access Management: Role-based access that maps to real job functions

February 3, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(4) covers information access management. This post walks through role-based access that maps to real job functions, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is a standard, so it must be met in full; the addressable implementation specifications beneath it are each assessed and documented on their own.

Read more →

Termination Procedures: Closing access the day someone leaves

February 2, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(C) covers termination procedures. This post walks through closing access the day someone leaves, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is an addressable implementation specification, which means documenting your reasoning is part of the requirement.

Read more →

Workforce Clearance Procedure: Workforce clearance that fits a small practice

January 30, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B) covers workforce clearance procedure. This post walks through workforce clearance that fits a small practice, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is an addressable implementation specification, which means documenting your reasoning is part of the requirement.

Read more →

Authorization and/or Supervision: Authorization and supervision for staff who touch ePHI

January 29, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A) covers authorization and/or supervision. This post walks through authorization and supervision for staff who touch ePHI, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is an addressable implementation specification, which means documenting your reasoning is part of the requirement.

Read more →

Assigned Security Responsibility: Naming a security official and giving the role real authority

January 28, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(2) covers assigned security responsibility. This post walks through naming a security official and giving the role real authority, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is a standard, so it must be met in full and there is no documented-alternative route.

Read more →

Information System Activity Review: Reviewing system activity without drowning in logs

January 27, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) covers information system activity review. This post walks through reviewing system activity without drowning in logs, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is a required implementation specification, so there is no documented-alternative route.

Read more →

Sanction Policy: Writing a sanction policy you will actually apply

January 26, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(C) covers sanction policy. This post walks through writing a sanction policy you will actually apply, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is a required implementation specification, so there is no documented-alternative route.

Read more →

Risk Management: Turning risk findings into tracked remediation

January 23, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B) covers risk management. This post walks through turning risk findings into tracked remediation, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is a required implementation specification, so there is no documented-alternative route.

Read more →

Risk Analysis: What a defensible analysis has to contain

January 22, 2026

45 CFR 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) covers risk analysis. This post walks through what a defensible analysis has to contain, with the language of the requirement itself and the evidence an assessor asks to see. It is a required implementation specification, so there is no documented-alternative route.

Read more →
Page 16 of 16 Newer posts →
Backsplice

HIPAA compliance and AI governance, in one program.

View our security posture →

Product

  • Why Backsplice
  • Frameworks
  • Watney AI
  • HIPAA Records
  • Review & Approval
  • Governance Registers
  • Reporting
  • Integrations & API
  • Pricing

Company

  • About Us
  • Team
  • Mission
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Data Processing Agreement
  • Business Associate Agreement
  • Security

Resources

  • Documentation
  • Guide to HIPAA
  • Blog
  • Status Page

© 2026 Backsplice LLC. All rights reserved.

Backsplice provides tools to run a HIPAA and AI governance program; it does not confer compliance with any law or standard and does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel for specific compliance guidance.